|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
May 21st, 2009, 15:50 | #1 |
CA vs G&G
Classic Army M4 or G&G M4 (CAS) version.
The G&G is more expensive, but everyone is saying classic army is better quality. i need to know! |
|
May 21st, 2009, 15:55 | #2 |
Classic army hands down...
Unless it's a Classic Army Sportline.. Then it'll be on-par with the G&G. |
|
May 21st, 2009, 15:56 | #3 |
CA have 2 lines - the Sportsline, and Proline.
CA Proline are the metal, heavy duty guns with reinforced internals and such. They're the "good" CA guns. CA Sportline are their relatively new cheap line of guns. They have regular, non-reinforced internals and lower quality metal out parts. Also, most have plastic receivers, although they now make Sportsline guns with metal receivers as well. If the CA you're looking at is cheaper than a G&G, then it's definitely the Sportline. I'd go with the G&G. It costs a bit more, but you also have a better quality gun, at least in terms of internals. Externals are about the same grade as the CA Sportsline.
__________________
|
|
May 21st, 2009, 15:58 | #4 |
Unless it's a Sportline, the CA will be more expensive, and also better quality.
|
|
May 21st, 2009, 16:02 | #5 |
Alright.
Im going with the G&G. |
|
May 21st, 2009, 16:18 | #6 |
G&G hands down
__________________
Semper Primus: Always First |
|
May 21st, 2009, 19:12 | #7 | |
Unless it's a sportline, Classic Army guns are superior to G&G in pretty much every way.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
Bookmarks |
|
|