|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
January 24th, 2009, 11:35 | #1 |
G&G G&P?
Hi, I know this thread was started earlier by some other people but there wans't much on it and I'd liek to know more!
Are they in the same class? First of all: What is the rep they have for internals/externals. I'm looking to buy an m4 with a metal body, so I can get a G&P for 530 with the metal body, or a G&G for 300 + 250 for the metal body, in the end comes up to around the same thign with G&G a bit more expensive. Is it worth it to buy the G&G separetely? G&G has an 25000 rpm motor, decent gearbox with bearing bushings. I'm not too sure on the m120 motor and gearbox of the G&P, could someone enlighten me? I know for a fact though that G&P has metal hopup where G&G has plastic, but that's only a 30 dollar upgrade perhaps? But again, makes G&G more expensive. Same question asked: Worth it? One more question, is the G&P wired to the front for battery? That's where I want to put my battery for my project. Any other quality comments between the brands? Anyone have any other comments on use? Thank you! |
|
February 26th, 2009, 03:12 | #2 | |
Quote:
For anyone who wants info on this subject: G&P is a whole other quality compared to G&G. G&P is much better than KA, ICS and a bit better than CA, so people say. It is a very reliable gun and is definately worth the money if you can get it for 500 like grim fandango was selling. I would expect almost 1k for a G&P. Reinforced gearbox with 7mm bearings, allumninum air nozzel, Metal hopup, and lots of goddies. Sorry for this new thread, delete if you may. |
||
February 26th, 2009, 03:19 | #3 | ||
Quote:
__________________
Latest Infractions Received : Being a dumb ass - Inspired by pusangani Quote:
sexy time |
|||
February 26th, 2009, 03:38 | #4 |
February 26th, 2009, 05:36 | #5 |
I would debate on whether G&P is better then CA but it's definitely better then G&G. G&G is midrange of the midgrade guns. CA is about midrange of the highgrade guns. There's some argument about where G&P should fall, I've seen people put them anywhere from the highrange of the midgrade to the midrange of the highgrade. I have never personally handled a G&P so I can't speak from firsthand experience but as far the the trends in pricing in the classifieds go, the consensus seems to place G&P in the low range of the highgrade guns. Usually about a hundred or so dollars cheaper then CA guns.
Kuro_Neko |
|
February 26th, 2009, 11:25 | #6 | |
Quote:
i personaly wouldn't put them in the midrange...
__________________
Guardians of Asgaard |
||
February 26th, 2009, 11:52 | #7 | |
Indeed. The G&G L85 is terrible and known for constant failures.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
February 26th, 2009, 13:25 | #8 | |
Quote:
As with most manufacturers, G&G have their good and their bad models so where they fall is alittle fuzzy. Even TM has bad models, I wouldn't buy a stock TM M16 under any circumstances. Internals might be great but that three piece barrel is horrible. Kuro_Neko |
||
February 26th, 2009, 13:29 | #9 |
well for people that have handled G&P, they usually say, GOD
LOL like most rankings of brands I've seen, G&P goes higher than CA and ya... |
|
February 26th, 2009, 13:46 | #10 | |
Quote:
Kuro_Neko |
||
February 26th, 2009, 13:53 | #11 |
G&P is made out of a high grade of aluminum, G&G is made out of a magnesium alloy...
You be the judge. |
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|