|
Please remember that just because the rcmp are listing things on the frt site as prohibited, the site itself is not the legal authority and in fact the rcmp say that on the site. There must be specifics listed in the actual law itself, ie: federal statute, for example high cap mags and actual firearm suppressors are specifically listed as prohibited devices. I?m just as concerned as the next person, and this topic is covered by more knowledgeable people than I on the Canadiangunnutz forum. The frt system is something that is frequently used by crown attnys but not all the time. Ultimately, things r analyzed on a case by case basis, the frt system info alone is not enough for a conviction without other statutes to support it. It?s terrible that people have to spend all kinds of money to legally defend themselves on an issue that frequently ends up in an acquittal. Pls look at the gunnutz site for more-educated opinions than mine.
|