Airsoft Canada

Airsoft Canada (https://airsoftcanada.com/forums.php)
-   Airsoft Guns Discussion (https://airsoftcanada.com/forumdisplay.php?f=53)
-   -   Inokatsu 2011 Armalite line up (https://airsoftcanada.com/showthread.php?t=120397)

Sim123456 March 11th, 2011 21:53

Inokatsu 2011 Armalite line up
 
Most impressive AR I can think off. Look bad ass. Price also looks bad ass lol 1350$us for the M16A4 and 280$us for the super bolt alone. Personnaly if I could I would but I can't so I wont.

http://www.airsoftnews.fr/wp-content...rine-Corps.jpg

http://www.airsoftnews.fr/wp-content...-NAVY-SEAL.jpg

http://www.airsoftnews.fr/wp-content...-SOP-MOD-0.jpg

http://www.airsoftnews.fr/wp-content...-Superbolt.jpg

Shatter March 11th, 2011 22:01

Just when you thought your wallet was safe...

Sim123456 March 11th, 2011 22:23

Ya, the problem in life is that there's always something better, cooler, greater... and more expensive!

kullwarrior March 11th, 2011 22:49

Don't want, they still didn't fix that ugly forge mold seam....look at 2nd picture at the magwell.

T@NK March 11th, 2011 23:19

Don't want, rather save money for the RS GBBR.

Sim123456 March 12th, 2011 02:30

Ya, the infamous mold seam lol I still didn't decided if in, globaly, affect the quality of gun. For me, a forged receiver, even with a mold seam, is better then a die-cast receiver without it.

By the, I notice that my new VFC M4A1 GBBR has also this mold seam, but it's thinnier.

dracu March 12th, 2011 03:42

1350$us for the M16A4 and 280$us for the super bolt alone. $2000 for upgrades and repairs to make it reliable, but its ok its only $6.00 for tylenol for your headache. lol.

SteelToe March 12th, 2011 06:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by dracu (Post 1426906)
1350$us for the M16A4 and 280$us for the super bolt alone. $2000 for upgrades and repairs to make it reliable, but its ok its only $6.00 for tylenol for your headache. lol.

This was just out. Whats wrong with it that its not reliable?

Anyone sell this in Canada?

Dynamo March 12th, 2011 07:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by dracu (Post 1426906)
1350$us for the M16A4 and 280$us for the super bolt alone. $2000 for upgrades and repairs in an attempt to make it reliable, but its ok its only $6.00 for tylenol for your headache. lol.

^fixed

the bolt retention design is the same as all the other failed attempts.. no thanks.

can anyone say "Reduce, Reuse and Recycle"..

it's like a reoccurring nightmare.
manufacturer releases new gun, claims to be new and improved. design is unchanged, so the same issues from the first gen WAs are still there. the sheeple got nuts, claim that this time they have fixed the problems and chew out anyone who criticizes their purchase. page after page of new topics pop up in the trouble shooting section of forums around the world, with the same complaints from two years ago. 3rd party manufacturer re-releases so called "improved parts" to fix the known issues, which fix nothing. more new posts in the trouble shooting section. apologetics blame the users for their problems, and think that replacing most of the internals every few weeks is normal and part of the design.

rinse, repeat... pathetic.

waiting on the next release. not expecting any change.

SteelToe March 12th, 2011 08:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dynamo (Post 1426935)
^fixed

the bolt retention design is the same as all the other failed attempts.. no thanks.

can anyone say "Reduce, Reuse and Recycle"..

it's like a reoccurring nightmare.
manufacturer releases new gun, claims to be new and improved. design is unchanged, so the same issues from the first gen WAs are still there. the sheeple got nuts, claim that this time they have fixed the problems and chew out anyone who criticizes their purchase. page after page of new topics pop up in the trouble shooting section of forums around the world, with the same complaints from two years ago. 3rd party manufacturer re-releases so called "improved parts" to fix the known issues, which fix nothing. more new posts in the trouble shooting section. apologetics blame the users for their problems, and think that replacing most of the internals every few weeks is normal and part of the design.

rinse, repeat... pathetic.

waiting on the next release. not expecting any change.

So youre talking about WA. What about Inokatsu? The same problems? I dont see any Ino thread listing its problems. Im trying to understand.

Dynamo March 12th, 2011 09:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by ExtraExtra (Post 1426940)
So youre talking about WA. What about Inokatsu? The same problems? I dont see any Ino thread listing its problems. Im trying to understand.

Inukatsu is a WA based system, if you don't know that, you know nothing about the WA system. the only real difference is in the length of the carrier (in this case Inu's carrier comes at WA length standard, and they include a spacer/weight for use in Inu/Prime receivers), everything else is practically identical.

i care not what materials they use, if the engineering behind the system is bad, the product will fail.

Kid March 12th, 2011 09:25

Well, I like it, but the price is extremely high.

I wish they would stop releasing their guns with RIS systems by default. I'd prefer high quality handguards.

Anyway... I'm with T@NK. I'll wait for the RealSword. Will be cheaper and should be better.

Sim123456 March 12th, 2011 09:44

Quote:

I wish they would stop releasing their guns with RIS systems by default. I'd prefer high quality handguards
I think exactly the samething! I need real handguard.

But by the, except the WE close chamber, for now, you can only goes with th WA design because, well, there's nothing else ^^

SteelToe March 12th, 2011 09:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dynamo (Post 1426967)
Inukatsu is a WA based system, if you don't know that, you know nothing about the WA system. the only real difference is in the length of the carrier (in this case Inu's carrier comes at WA length standard, and they include a spacer/weight for use in Inu/Prime receivers), everything else is practically identical.

i care not what materials they use, if the engineering behind the system is bad, the product will fail.

Ino is WA based. Roger that.

So the brand/config that seems to be better is WE's open bolt system. It went through a real life exercise earlier as reported by Brian.

hattrick March 12th, 2011 13:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by ExtraExtra (Post 1426980)
Ino is WA based. Roger that.

So the brand/config that seems to be better is WE's open bolt system. It went through a real life exercise earlier as reported by Brian.

That was the closed bolt system.

R.I.T.Z March 12th, 2011 13:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by ExtraExtra (Post 1426980)
Ino is WA based. Roger that.

So the brand/config that seems to be better is WE's open bolt system. It went through a real life exercise earlier as reported by Brian.

open bolt = cool
closed bolt = reliability

and at 1300$ I'll wait for a RS gbbr
or a reliable full size AK

Brian McIlmoyle March 12th, 2011 13:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by R.I.T.Z (Post 1427067)
open bolt = cool
closed bolt = reliability

and at 1300$ I'll wait for a RS gbbr
or a reliable full size AK

Open bolt = cool... for the first 10 minutes.. then you realize that all it means is reduced reliability and service life.

of course it depends on why you buy the guns. For me it's about performance and effective simulation of the real firearm for training purposes.

For others its about sitting in their basement in their underwear racking the bolt while a little bit of spittle leaks out of the corner of their mouths.

c3sk March 12th, 2011 14:23

Although it looks pretty.. The only one I am interested in checking out/owning besides the WETTI would be the real sword m4 GBBR (As previously stated in this thread)... whenever they release that is! This is mainly due to the quality of the upper/lower I've been hearing so much about.

As it stands, WETTI's seem to be quite the work horse, and that's really what draws me towards the platform.

F*ck it, maybe I'll just try and get both.

hattrick March 12th, 2011 14:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian McIlmoyle (Post 1427072)
Open bolt = cool... for the first 10 minutes.. then you realize that all it means is reduced reliability and service life.

of course it depends on why you buy the guns. For me it's about performance and effective simulation of the real firearm for training purposes.

For others its about sitting in their basement in their underwear racking the bolt while a little bit of spittle leaks out of the corner of their mouths.

Im not convinced the open bolt system means 'reduced reliability'.....

What brings you to this conclusion?


edit / thread jack

-alex

Cifyra March 12th, 2011 14:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by T@NK (Post 1426808)
Don't want, rather save money for the RS GBBR.

Save up for the QBU-88 that's coming out ;D

kullwarrior March 12th, 2011 15:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by hattrick (Post 1427094)
Im not convinced the open bolt system means 'reduced reliability'.....

What brings you to this conclusion?


edit / thread jack

-alex

More parts = more parts to break
More moving parts = more parts to break

Still won't bite the closed nozzle system. It's not my taste, I like crisp cycling (WE closed chamber seem to be like sluggish)

AngelusNex March 12th, 2011 15:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by kullwarrior (Post 1427119)
More parts = more parts to break
More moving parts = more parts to break

Still won't bite the closed nozzle system. It's not my taste, I like crisp cycling (WE closed chamber seem to be like sluggish)

Closed also requirs allot of lubrication, I've killed an o-ring in mine by forgetting to add silly oil to the propane. But if, like myself you don't mind lower ROF on a gbbr and you keep it lubbed your golden with closed.


Back on topic though: Inu's are not worth the money when the much more reliable WEs are so much cheaper.

Brian McIlmoyle March 12th, 2011 15:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by hattrick (Post 1427094)
Im not convinced the open bolt system means 'reduced reliability'.....

What brings you to this conclusion?


edit / thread jack

-alex

The manufacturer says it is so., this is why open bolt will be sold to airsofters and the AWSS ( brass tube ) system will be marketed to LE/MIL

airsofters complain about reliability.. but still want "cool" ,LE\MIL want robust reliable training tools

Ballcancer March 12th, 2011 16:49

I agree with the comments on the WETTI closed bolt system. The only two problems I have had, is I did not add enough oil to the propane to keep the bolt functioning smoothly, obvious user fault, and the pin holding the roller on the hammer came loose, user fault as I did not catch it by closely inspecting each part. Even with those two malfunctions, the weapon was still functioning, not as smoothly, but still functioning.

From what I have read about the WA based systems, parts wearing out quickly for one example, as well as constant attention to the weapon to keep it runing some of the time? I don't think I would bother with that. I want a reliable system that will keep working regardless of exposure to the elements, and physical abuse, this goes the same with the magazines as well. So far my WE has not let me down due to design, but due to operator error, that was later rectified and learned from.

Gato March 12th, 2011 17:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ballcancer (Post 1427159)
I agree with the comments on the WETTI closed bolt system. The only two problems I have had, is I did not add enough oil to the propane to keep the bolt functioning smoothly, obvious user fault, and the pin holding the roller on the hammer came loose, user fault as I did not catch it by closely inspecting each part. Even with those two malfunctions, the weapon was still functioning, not as smoothly, but still functioning.

From what I have read about the WA based systems, parts wearing out quickly for one example, as well as constant attention to the weapon to keep it runing some of the time? I don't think I would bother with that. I want a reliable system that will keep working regardless of exposure to the elements, and physical abuse, this goes the same with the magazines as well. So far my WE has not let me down due to design, but due to operator error, that was later rectified and learned from.

Only time I EVER had an issue was when I ran shit BB's I had to borrow from someone, NEVER running any but Bastards again. I've seen a number of WA and KJW's go down, that shit is UNACCEPTABLE in anything I'll run.

Bastards + basic maintenance + WE (rifle) = fucking Jesus gun

Also, I like my closed bolt, sometimes you get a flash of the brass colour, kinda like a shell ejecting :P

Ballcancer March 12th, 2011 19:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gato (Post 1427175)
Only time I EVER had an issue was when I ran shit BB's I had to borrow from someone, NEVER running any but Bastards again. I've seen a number of WA and KJW's go down, that shit is UNACCEPTABLE in anything I'll run.

Bastards + basic maintenance + WE (rifle) = fucking Jesus gun

Also, I like my closed bolt, sometimes you get a flash of the brass colour, kinda like a shell ejecting :P

Hehe yea the brass tube can be neat to see some times when the weapon is cycling lol, but you are right as long as basic maintenance is applied and te gun is cleaned after every game (as with all weapons, though the WE's will still work lol) it will serve you well (unless it was made on a monday or a friday lol :D)

kullwarrior March 12th, 2011 20:34

Guys can we get back to topic? This is become another WE system bashing at KJ and WA.

Seriously people aren't going to change their side, suck it up.

Ballcancer March 12th, 2011 21:03

Yes you are absolutely right, let's get back on topic.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.